最高院：公司股东持非备案印章签署合同是否构成表见代理？_开正资讯

开正头条

热门文章

联系我们

综合管理部：潘鑫

电话：0537-3201086

地址：山东省济宁市洸河路建筑设计大厦四层

邮箱：sdkzlaw@sina.com

开正头条: 最高院：公司股东持非备案印章签署合同是否构成表见代理？

编辑：开正律师事务所　发布时间：2020-03-19　浏览量：400
<p><section style="margin:0px;padding:0px;max-width:100%;color:#333333;font-family:-apple-system-font, blinkmacsystemfont, "helvetica neue", "pingfang sc", "hiragino sans gb", "microsoft yahei ui", "microsoft yahei", arial, sans-serif;font-size:16px;letter-spacing:0.544px;text-align:center;background-color:#ffffff;display:flex;justify-content:flex-start;align-items:flex-start;box-sizing:border-box !important;word-wrap:break-word !important;"><section data-brushtype="text" style="margin:0px;padding:4px 10px;max-width:100%;box-sizing:border-box !important;word-wrap:break-word !important;background-image:-webkit-linear-gradient(left, #f65343, #f7956a);color:#ffffff;transform:rotate(0deg);">裁判要旨</section><section data-autoskip="1" style="margin:4px 0px 0px 12px;padding:0px;max-width:100%;box-sizing:border-box !important;word-wrap:break-word !important;font-size:14px;letter-spacing:1.5px;flex:1 1 0%;text-align:justify;color:#e94c34;line-height:1.75em;"><section style="margin:20px 0px;padding:0px;max-width:100%;color:#333333;font-size:17px;letter-spacing:0.544px;line-height:1.75em;font-family:-apple-system-font, blinkmacsystemfont, arial, sans-serif;box-sizing:border-box !important;word-wrap:break-word !important;overflow-wrap:break-word !important;"><span style="margin:0px;padding:0px;max-width:100%;font-size:18px;text-indent:2em;letter-spacing:1px;box-sizing:border-box !important;word-wrap:break-word !important;overflow-wrap:break-word !important;">实践中不能仅以合同中加盖的印章印文与公司备案印章印文或常用业务印章印文不一致来否定公司行为的成立及其效力，而应当根据合同签订人是否有权代表或代理公司进行相关民事行为来判断。案涉《协议书》由公司股东签订，其并非公司法定代表人，亦无证据证明其在公司任职或具有代理公司对外进行相关民事行为的授权，仅具有股东身份不足以成为其在案涉《协议书》上签字盖章的合理理由，该行为亦不构成表见代理。</span></section></section></section><section style="margin:1em 0px 0px;padding:0px;max-width:100%;color:#333333;font-family:-apple-system-font, blinkmacsystemfont, "helvetica neue", "pingfang sc", "hiragino sans gb", "microsoft yahei ui", "microsoft yahei", arial, sans-serif;font-size:16px;letter-spacing:0.544px;text-align:center;background-color:#ffffff;display:flex;justify-content:flex-start;align-items:flex-start;box-sizing:border-box !important;word-wrap:break-word !important;"><section data-brushtype="text" style="margin:0px;padding:4px 10px;max-width:100%;box-sizing:border-box !important;word-wrap:break-word !important;background-image:-webkit-linear-gradient(left, #f65343, #f7956a);color:#ffffff;transform:rotate(0deg);">案例索引</section><section data-autoskip="1" style="margin:4px 0px 0px 12px;padding:0px;max-width:100%;box-sizing:border-box !important;word-wrap:break-word !important;font-size:14px;letter-spacing:1.5px;flex:1 1 0%;text-align:justify;color:#e94c34;line-height:1.75em;"><p style="padding:0px;max-width:100%;clear:both;min-height:1em;box-sizing:border-box !important;word-wrap:break-word !important;margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px;"><span style="margin:0px;padding:0px;max-width:100%;color:#333333;font-size:18px;letter-spacing:1px;text-indent:36px;font-family:-apple-system-font, blinkmacsystemfont, arial, sans-serif;box-sizing:border-box !important;word-wrap:break-word !important;">《青海宏信混凝土有限公司、海天建设集团有限公司青海分公司民间借贷纠纷案》【（2019）最高法民终1535号】</span></p><p style="padding:0px;max-width:100%;clear:both;min-height:1em;box-sizing:border-box !important;word-wrap:break-word !important;margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px;"><br style="margin:0px;padding:0px;max-width:100%;box-sizing:border-box !important;word-wrap:break-word !important;" /></p></section></section><section style="margin:1em 0px 0px;padding:0px;max-width:100%;color:#333333;font-family:-apple-system-font, blinkmacsystemfont, "helvetica neue", "pingfang sc", "hiragino sans gb", "microsoft yahei ui", "microsoft yahei", arial, sans-serif;font-size:16px;letter-spacing:0.544px;text-align:center;background-color:#ffffff;display:flex;justify-content:flex-start;align-items:flex-start;box-sizing:border-box !important;word-wrap:break-word !important;"><section data-brushtype="text" style="margin:0px;padding:4px 10px;max-width:100%;box-sizing:border-box !important;word-wrap:break-word !important;background-image:-webkit-linear-gradient(left, #f65343, #f7956a);color:#ffffff;transform:rotate(0deg);">争议焦点</section><section data-autoskip="1" style="margin:4px 0px 0px 12px;padding:0px;max-width:100%;box-sizing:border-box !important;word-wrap:break-word !important;font-size:14px;letter-spacing:1.5px;flex:1 1 0%;text-align:justify;color:#e94c34;line-height:1.75em;"><p style="padding:0px;max-width:100%;clear:both;min-height:1em;box-sizing:border-box !important;word-wrap:break-word !important;margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px;"><span style="margin:0px;padding:0px;max-width:100%;color:#333333;font-size:18px;letter-spacing:1px;text-indent:36px;font-family:-apple-system-font, blinkmacsystemfont, arial, sans-serif;box-sizing:border-box !important;word-wrap:break-word !important;">公司股东持非备案印章签署合同是否构成表见代理？</span></p><p style="padding:0px;max-width:100%;clear:both;min-height:1em;box-sizing:border-box !important;word-wrap:break-word !important;margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px;"><br style="margin:0px;padding:0px;max-width:100%;box-sizing:border-box !important;word-wrap:break-word !important;" /></p></section></section></p><section style="margin:0px;padding:0px;max-width:100%;color:#333333;font-family:-apple-system-font, blinkmacsystemfont, "helvetica neue", "pingfang sc", "hiragino sans gb", "microsoft yahei ui", "microsoft yahei", arial, sans-serif;font-size:16px;letter-spacing:0.544px;text-align:center;background-color:#ffffff;box-sizing:border-box !important;word-wrap:break-word !important;"><section style="margin:1em 0px 0px;padding:0px;max-width:100%;box-sizing:border-box !important;word-wrap:break-word !important;display:flex;justify-content:flex-start;align-items:flex-start;"><section data-brushtype="text" style="margin:0px;padding:4px 10px;max-width:100%;box-sizing:border-box !important;word-wrap:break-word !important;background-image:-webkit-linear-gradient(left, #f65343, #f7956a);color:#ffffff;transform:rotate(0deg);">裁判意见</section><section data-autoskip="1" style="margin:4px 0px 0px 12px;padding:0px;max-width:100%;box-sizing:border-box !important;word-wrap:break-word !important;font-size:14px;letter-spacing:1.5px;flex:1 1 0%;text-align:justify;color:#e94c34;line-height:1.75em;"><p style="padding:0px;max-width:100%;clear:both;min-height:1em;box-sizing:border-box !important;word-wrap:break-word !important;margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px;"><span style="margin:0px;padding:0px;max-width:100%;color:#333333;font-size:18px;line-height:1.5em;letter-spacing:1px;font-family:-apple-system-font, blinkmacsystemfont, arial, sans-serif;box-sizing:border-box !important;word-wrap:break-word !important;overflow-wrap:break-word !important;">最高院认为：</span><span style="margin:0px;padding:0px;max-width:100%;color:#333333;font-size:17px;letter-spacing:1px;font-family:-apple-system-font, blinkmacsystemfont, arial, sans-serif;box-sizing:border-box !important;word-wrap:break-word !important;overflow-wrap:break-word !important;"><span style="margin:0px;padding:0px;max-width:100%;font-size:18px;line-height:1.5em;box-sizing:border-box !important;word-wrap:break-word !important;overflow-wrap:break-word !important;">虽然经鉴定案涉《协议书》中安多汇鑫公司的印章印文与安多汇鑫公司提交的样本印章印文不一致，但如前所述</span></span><span style="margin:0px;padding:0px;max-width:100%;color:#333333;letter-spacing:1px;font-size:18px;line-height:1.5em;font-family:-apple-system-font, blinkmacsystemfont, arial, sans-serif;box-sizing:border-box !important;word-wrap:break-word !important;overflow-wrap:break-word !important;">，不能仅以合同中加盖的印章印文与公司备案印章印文或常用业务印章印文不一致来否定公司行为的成立及其效力，而应当根据合同签订人是否有权代表或代理公司进行相关民事行为来判断。根据查明的事实，案涉《协议书》签订时，崔文辉为安多汇鑫公司的股东，但并非安多汇鑫公司法定代表人，亦无证据证明其在安多汇鑫公司任职或具有代理安多汇鑫公司对外进行相关民事行为的授权。而仅因崔文辉系安多汇鑫公司股东，不足以成为青海宏信公司相信崔文辉有权代理安多汇鑫公司在案涉《协议书》上签字盖章的合理理由，故崔文辉的行为亦不构成表见代理，对安多汇鑫公司不具有约束力。因此，青海宏信公司与安多汇鑫公司之</span><span style="margin:0px;padding:0px;max-width:100%;color:#333333;font-size:18px;line-height:1.5em;letter-spacing:1px;font-family:-apple-system-font, blinkmacsystemfont, arial, sans-serif;box-sizing:border-box !important;word-wrap:break-word !important;overflow-wrap:break-word !important;">间并未形成有效的担保合同关系，其主张安多汇鑫公司承担连带保证责任的请求不能成立。</span><span style="margin:0px;padding:0px;max-width:100%;color:#333333;font-size:18px;line-height:1.5em;letter-spacing:1px;font-family:-apple-system-font, blinkmacsystemfont, arial, sans-serif;box-sizing:border-box !important;word-wrap:break-word !important;overflow-wrap:break-word !important;">一审判决对该问题认定并无不当。</span></p></section></section></section><p><br /></p>

上一篇文章：最高院司法观点：当事人在二审中能否申请鉴定？

下一篇文章：最高法院:网络司法拍卖成交的,是否应签成交确认书?

开正头条

热门文章

联系我们

开正头条

最高院：公司股东持非备案印章签署合同是否构成表见代理？

QQ咨询

电话咨询